top of page

USFDA Guidance: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data in Clinical Trials and Postapproval Pregnancy Safety Studies

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to modernize clinical research and postmarketing safety monitoring through new guidance documents focused on digital health technologies and real-world safety evidence.

In May 2026, FDA published two important guidance documents:



Guidance on Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Data in Clinical Trials

What is Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)?

Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems are digital health technologies that continuously measure glucose levels in the body throughout the day and night. Unlike traditional finger-stick glucose testing, CGM devices provide:

  • Near real-time glucose measurements

  • Glucose trends over time

  • Automated glucose data collection

  • Continuous monitoring during daily activities

These systems are increasingly used in clinical trials for diabetes therapies and other metabolic conditions. The guidance provides recommendations on how sponsors should standardize and submit CGM data in clinical trials supporting marketing applications for drugs and biologics.

The main goal of the guidance is to improve consistency and standardization in the submission of CGM data to FDA. The document explains how sponsors should prepare:

  • SDTM datasets

  • ADaM datasets

  • Tables and figures

  • Metadata documentation

  • Analysis-ready datasets

for regulatory review.

FDA explains that standardized CGM submissions may help facilitate more efficient review of clinical trial data. According to the guidance, CGM systems generate several types of data, including:

Epoch-Level Data

These are detailed glucose readings collected at frequent intervals such as:

  • Every 1 minute

  • Every 5 minutes

  • Every 15 minutes

depending on the CGM device used.

Intermediate Summary Data

These datasets summarize glucose information over specific periods such as:

  • Daily summaries

  • Weekly summaries

  • Time-in-range calculations

Final Analysis Data

These datasets contain the final study endpoints used in statistical analyses and regulatory review.

Examples may include:

  • Average glucose levels

  • Time in range (TIR)

  • Hypoglycemia episodes

  • Hyperglycemia measurements

FDA Recommendations for CGM Data Submission

The guidance recommends that sponsors use standardized CDISC data models including:

  • SDTM (Study Data Tabulation Model)

  • ADaM (Analysis Data Model)

FDA also recommends submitting:

  • Define-XML metadata

  • Reviewer guides

  • Analysis programs

  • Device-level information

This standardization may help improve traceability and consistency during FDA review.

Digital Health Technology Considerations

FDA emphasizes that CGM systems are considered digital health technologies (DHTs).

The guidance discusses important considerations such as:

  • Device identifiers

  • Software versions

  • Sensor replacement events

  • Data transmission issues

  • Device upgrades or changes during the study

FDA encourages sponsors to maintain consistent CGM models throughout a clinical trial whenever feasible.


Guidance on Postapproval Pregnancy Safety Studies

Why Pregnancy Safety Data Is Important

Pregnant women are often excluded from clinical trials, which means limited human safety data may be available when drugs are first approved. However, many women may still require medications during pregnancy for conditions such as:

  • Diabetes

  • Asthma

  • Epilepsy

  • Hypertension

  • Infections

Additionally, unintended pregnancies may result in accidental drug exposure during pregnancy. The guidance provides recommendations for sponsors conducting pregnancy safety studies for FDA-regulated drugs and biologics after product approval. The guidance explains how sponsors and investigators can design studies to evaluate pregnancy-related safety outcomes associated with drug exposure.

The goal is to generate clinically relevant human safety data that may help healthcare professionals better understand:

  • Risks during pregnancy

  • Potential fetal effects

  • Maternal safety outcomes

  • Postpartum outcomes

The information may eventually support updates to product labeling.

Common Types of Pregnancy Safety Studies

FDA discusses several study approaches that may be used in postmarketing safety monitoring.

1. Case Reports and Case Series

Spontaneous adverse event reports and published case reports may help identify potential safety signals.

Important information collected may include:

  • Drug exposure timing

  • Dose and duration

  • Maternal medical history

  • Pregnancy outcomes

  • Fetal abnormalities

  • Concomitant medications

FDA explains that well-documented case reports can sometimes identify rare teratogenic risks.

2. Pregnancy Registries

Pregnancy registries are prospective observational studies that collect information from pregnant women exposed to specific drugs.

These registries may help evaluate:

  • Congenital abnormalities

  • Pregnancy complications

  • Birth outcomes

  • Infant development

FDA explains that pregnancy registries are valuable because they collect detailed patient-level real-world data.

However, challenges may include:

  • Difficult patient recruitment

  • Limited enrollment

  • Loss to follow-up

  • Small sample sizes

3. Complementary Real-World Studies

FDA also discusses the use of:

  • Electronic health records

  • Medical claims databases

  • Population-based surveillance systems

  • Case-control studies

  • National registries

These complementary approaches may help support broader safety evaluations.

Challenges in Pregnancy Safety Research

FDA acknowledges that pregnancy safety research can be difficult because of:

  • Limited preapproval data

  • Rare adverse outcomes

  • Ethical concerns in pregnant populations

  • Small exposure populations

  • Confounding factors

  • Incomplete reporting

Because of these limitations, FDA encourages the use of multiple complementary study methods when appropriate.

Together, these documents demonstrate FDA’s continued efforts to modernize regulatory science, improve data quality, strengthen patient safety monitoring, and support evidence-based healthcare decision-making.


References

For complete details, refer to the official FDA guidances:

For complete details, refer to the official FDA guidances:

Comments


I Sometimes Send Newsletters

Thanks for submitting!

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram

DISCLAIMER

The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any guidance of government, health authority, it's purely my understanding. This Blog/Web Site is made available by a regulatory professional, is for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the pharmaceutical regulations, and not to provide specific regulatory advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent pharma regulatory advice and you should discuss from an authenticated regulatory professional in your state.  We have made every reasonable effort to present accurate information on our website; however, we are not responsible for any of the results you experience while visiting our website and request to use official websites.

bottom of page